![]() |
|
The basics What do you hope to achieve with this site? How do you define the liberal-left? Am I part of it? Are you in bed with a particular political party? Are you against single-issue groups? I’m a bit right-wing and loathe liberals. Can I join in? Comments policy Liberal Conspiracy aims to foster a culture of constructive comments and useful dialogue between contributors and readers. We see that as vitally important in our efforts to reinvigorate the liberal-left with fresh ideas, challenge orthodoxies and forge a way forward. We have a stringent comments policy. We welcome constructive scrutiny of our views but will deal harshly with off-topic, diversionary or trollish comments. We believe in freedom of speech, but unwanted commenters are more than welcome to exercise their free speech elsewhere on the blogosphere. We don’t wish to censor them there. But we reserve the right to delete comments deemed abusive or troll-like in our space. We are not obliged to provide space to right-wing or left-wing loonies to abuse others or throw vitriol at writers. Abusive, sarcastic and troll-ish comments (aimed at writers or other commenters) will be deleted. Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted. You are welcome to write a complaint to the editors if you feel you are constantly treated unfairly. We may get back to you but we are under no obligation to. Allow us to stress once again: this is our collective blog and we have the right to set a stringent comments policy. If you do not like it you are under no obligation to participate. We value quality over quantity. Political parties Unlike other blogs dedicated to promoting specific political parties, we are dedicated to developing, discussion and promoting good ideas and policies. Some of our writers may have overt preference to specific political parties or even be members. That does not violate our rules or compromise our position. Writers and commenters are free to criticise any political party as long as they do so constructively and back it up with an argument. |
FAQs
» Not A Day Longer: against 42 days
· Home Office wants to save face · Brown presses on with 42 days · Shami Chakrabarti on 42 days · Goldsmith savages 42 days bill ![]()
Upcoming events
» Demonstration against new anti-terror laws » After May 1st: how can Labour win the south? » Spotlight on Russia » University science - a public good? » What about the workers?: Has the government done enough to secure working people’s support for a fourth term? » Progress annual conference
Latest comments
» Jennie posted on What is the case against government interference? » Aaron Heath posted on Cameron's Quarterly » thomas posted on Andrew Gilligan's hypocrisy » Naadir Jeewa posted on Trouble in comedy-land » anticant posted on Cameron's Quarterly » Johnny Vegas blurs the lines between rape and comedy at the UCL Bloomsbury posted on Trouble in comedy-land » Philip posted on What is the case against government interference? » al posted on Andrew Gilligan's hypocrisy » Aaron Heath posted on Cameron's Quarterly » Aaron Heath posted on Cameron's Quarterly » cjcjc posted on Cameron's Quarterly » cjcjc posted on Cameron's Quarterly » Adam Bienkov posted on Andrew Gilligan's hypocrisy » J Wild posted on Andrew Gilligan's hypocrisy » anticant posted on Cameron's Quarterly |
|