Comments on: What, no VED fallout? http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/03/what-no-ved-fallout/ If there wasn't one before, it's time we started it... Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:55:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Lee Griffin http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/03/what-no-ved-fallout/#comment-15276 Lee Griffin Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:49:44 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=943#comment-15276 Haha, I definitely know what you mean. I don't appreciate his tone, but it reminds me of the first letter I got from my MP, I accused him of towing the party line too often when I was particularly aggravated. He wrote back and, well...put me straight basically...but he did so in a way that didn't close down the communication. I'm definitely realising that perhaps my MP isn't as bad as I though he was to begin with. Haha, I definitely know what you mean. I don’t appreciate his tone, but it reminds me of the first letter I got from my MP, I accused him of towing the party line too often when I was particularly aggravated. He wrote back and, well…put me straight basically…but he did so in a way that didn’t close down the communication. I’m definitely realising that perhaps my MP isn’t as bad as I though he was to begin with.

]]> By: Jennie Rigg http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/03/what-no-ved-fallout/#comment-15274 Jennie Rigg Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:38:14 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=943#comment-15274 Is it bad that I now have a sneaking admiration for David Clelland for at least talking straight? Is it bad that I now have a sneaking admiration for David Clelland for at least talking straight?

]]> By: Lee Griffin http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/03/what-no-ved-fallout/#comment-15140 Lee Griffin Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:44:02 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=943#comment-15140 Well that'd be Sunny's bag ;) I don't disagree Well that’d be Sunny’s bag ;) I don’t disagree

]]> By: douglas clark http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/03/what-no-ved-fallout/#comment-15134 douglas clark Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:14:34 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=943#comment-15134 Lee, I think Anthony Barnetts' comments deserve a post of their own. Frankly, that is what I believe in. And I'd be astonished if most Liberal Conspirators thought otherwise. Anonymous - err, me - suggested that it should be cross posted here. Quite apart from the fact that it would make Unity look abrupt! Lee,

I think Anthony Barnetts’ comments deserve a post of their own. Frankly, that is what I believe in. And I’d be astonished if most Liberal Conspirators thought otherwise. Anonymous - err, me - suggested that it should be cross posted here. Quite apart from the fact that it would make Unity look abrupt!

]]> By: Lee Griffin http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/03/what-no-ved-fallout/#comment-15129 Lee Griffin Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:45:24 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/?p=943#comment-15129 <a href="http://www.griffindor.org.uk/2008/07/03/the-ved-fallout-is-here.html" rel="nofollow">My analysis of yesterdays Finance Bill debate</a>, really is a shame no-one else seemed to see it or care about writing about it. It was an amazing show of what I now like to call the "David Lammy rhetoric". My analysis of yesterdays Finance Bill debate, really is a shame no-one else seemed to see it or care about writing about it. It was an amazing show of what I now like to call the “David Lammy rhetoric”.

]]>