Inside the ‘war on terror’


by Jess McCabe    
June 9, 2008 at 2:57 pm

This American Life is a class act at any time, but this recent episode is a must-listen. It is an investigative report into what happened to Richard G. Convertino, the Justice Department lawyer who prosecuted the ‘Detroit Sleeper Cell’ case.

Arrested only days after 9/11, the four men tried in the case were meant to have been planning an attack - two of the men were found guilty by a grand jury, only to have the Justice Department voluntarily asked the judge to throw out the case.

It was supposed to be the first terrorist attack planned from American soil. It was quite unusual behaviour for the department to not only throw out its own case, but then go after its own prosecutor.

The podcast considers whether the decision was taken as part of a vendetta against Richard G Convertino, the prosecutor, who repeatedly ruffled feathers, breaching protocol and failing to get along with his colleagues. But the Justice Department’s attempt to bring criminal charges against Covertino failed and he then he sued them.

All of this is fascinating, but more so are the couple of glimpses of the information at contest in the trial - for example, one piece of evidence was a home video shot at Disneyland. In the podcast, it becomes clear that there’s a section of this video filming a duck pond - the prosecutors argued that some singing translated to an anti-US screed - the defence said it was a song about ducks. (The podcast producers don’t get their own independent translation, sadly enough!)

The case rested heavily on some sketches in a day planner - which could be a map of a US air base in Turkey, or not.

· About the author: Jess is an ardent feminist and environmentalist, and editor of the online magazine the F-Word.

· Other posts by Jess McCabe

· About this article:
Print it   |   Trackback link   |   Track comments   |   send to del.icio.us   |   to Facebook
Filed under: Blog , Civil liberties , United States


6 Comments in response   ||   Add your own



at 3:18 pm on June 9, 2008
- direct link -  
1.  comment by
     Jono

Unless I’m missing something (and I might be as I haven’t listened), but a Grand Jury doesn’t find anyone guilty of anything, it merely issues indictments. I can’t remember the burden of proof, but it is something along the lines of having an arguable case, nowhere near the ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that an actual criminal conviction requires.

at 3:20 pm on June 9, 2008
- direct link -  
2.  comment by
     Nick

Uhh, hold on. I didn’t think grand juries could find defendants guilty. They can only indict them: call them for trial before an ordinary jury.

at 4:46 pm on June 9, 2008
- direct link -  
3.  comment by
     Sunny Hundal

Bloody hell, this is really fascinating. Why did the justice dept throw out its own terrorist case, and then try and indict its own prosecutor.

The programme blames, possibly, office politics. Mind boggling.

at 5:28 pm on June 9, 2008
- direct link -  
4.  comment by
     Jess McCabe

Nick and Jono - I’m not sure, I am just using the language I (remember) from the podcast. I could be wrong - however, they were found guilty and then the conviction was overturned. Perhaps the grand jury bit was earlier on - there was something about leaks during that process.

at 9:15 pm on June 9, 2008
- direct link -  
5.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

*subscribes to This American Life in iTunes.*

at 10:30 pm on June 30, 2008
- direct link -  
6.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

This American Life is awesome, thank you Jess.

Post a comment using the form below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

HERE AND THERE
Featured blogs

Boris - the gaffopedia


David Lammy MP -

Can we follow Obama's lead?


Lynne Featherstone MP -

What about the dads?



Recently popular
Palin, abortion and the gender agenda
(332 replies)

The 'Gordon Brown is insane' meme
(164 replies)

A-Z of right-wing online commenting
(117 replies)

Lesbian mothers and 'traditional' families
(112 replies)

We should have open primaries for elections
(108 replies)

Latest comments
» Jennie Rigg posted on 'Loveable' banking?

» Scott Redding posted on A séance with Richard Nixon

» Mike Killingworth posted on 'Loveable' banking?

» Jennie Rigg posted on TODAY'S TOP STORIES / 12th October

» Jennie Rigg posted on 'Loveable' banking?

» Tom posted on Sins of Omission

» Aaron Heath posted on TODAY'S TOP STORIES / 12th October

» Tom posted on A séance with Richard Nixon

» Tom posted on Palin clears herself of any wrongdoing

» Woobegone posted on A séance with Richard Nixon

» joetarcy posted on Palin, abortion and the gender agenda

» Annie Besant posted on Labour: Tories want tax-breaks for rich

» Adam Gartner posted on Is the Future Conservative?

» Lee Griffin posted on Palin clears herself of any wrongdoing

» polly styrene posted on Yes, British councils were right to invest in Iceland

  Last 50 // Comments feed