<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It was Dorries wot lost it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/</link>
	<description>If there wasn't one before, it's time we started it...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-15759</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-15759</guid>
		<description>"Who knows just how much of an impact the blogging campaign against Dorries has had, if any,"

Well, I don't want to sound uncharitable, but given the amount of criticism there's been about how few MPs bother to even read emails, let alone blogs, I'd have to conclude that the blogging 'campaign' was marginal to say the least.  That's not to say that it wasn't worthwhile, as all debate is useful in generating interest.  But I'm guessing that most of the MPs who voted on the issue were of the same opinion at the beginning of the debate as they were at the end.  

Still, it's worthwhile keeping the discussion going about this odd woman, Dorries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who knows just how much of an impact the blogging campaign against Dorries has had, if any,&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t want to sound uncharitable, but given the amount of criticism there&#8217;s been about how few MPs bother to even read emails, let alone blogs, I&#8217;d have to conclude that the blogging &#8216;campaign&#8217; was marginal to say the least.  That&#8217;s not to say that it wasn&#8217;t worthwhile, as all debate is useful in generating interest.  But I&#8217;m guessing that most of the MPs who voted on the issue were of the same opinion at the beginning of the debate as they were at the end.  </p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s worthwhile keeping the discussion going about this odd woman, Dorries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neville</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10804</link>
		<dc:creator>Neville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10804</guid>
		<description>http://armchairnews.co.uk/2008/05/19/womens-bodies-become-a-political-football/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://armchairnews.co.uk/2008/05/19/womens-bodies-become-a-political-football/" rel="nofollow">http://armchairnews.co.uk/2008/05/19/womens-bodies-become-a-political-football/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Phillips-White</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10799</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Phillips-White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10799</guid>
		<description>Did anyone listen to 'Madine' being interviewed on BBC 5Live last night after the results were announced? She was still insisting that Labour MPs had been subject to a three line party whip, and in effect forced into voting against the amendments to back up the failing support for Gordon, especially after his comments at the weekend.

For Nadine to say that religious beliefs had not played a part in the vote was a blatant lie, as we are all aware.

I’m sure Nadine’s new friends at the LCF and Christian Concern for our Nation, (one in the same) have been deep in prayer today. I still think that there is a need for parliament need to investigate Nadine’s campaign – not only the funding issue, but the fact that an elected MP of this country is openly working with groups who send out such a hate filled message to many parts of the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone listen to &#8216;Madine&#8217; being interviewed on BBC 5Live last night after the results were announced? She was still insisting that Labour MPs had been subject to a three line party whip, and in effect forced into voting against the amendments to back up the failing support for Gordon, especially after his comments at the weekend.</p>
<p>For Nadine to say that religious beliefs had not played a part in the vote was a blatant lie, as we are all aware.</p>
<p>I’m sure Nadine’s new friends at the LCF and Christian Concern for our Nation, (one in the same) have been deep in prayer today. I still think that there is a need for parliament need to investigate Nadine’s campaign – not only the funding issue, but the fact that an elected MP of this country is openly working with groups who send out such a hate filled message to many parts of the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10794</guid>
		<description>"the 20 weeks campaign is most likely going to have to wait another good few years before it starts its war of misleading yet again"

It really depends on how the next election goes. Most Tory MPs support 20 weeks, most Labour and Lib Dems oppose it. If they keep splitting in the proportions they do, &lt;a href="http://viva-freemania.blogspot.com/2008/05/20-weeks-later.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;I reckon&lt;/a&gt; that a Tory majority of 38 would be the tipping point that puts the 20-weekers ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the 20 weeks campaign is most likely going to have to wait another good few years before it starts its war of misleading yet again&#8221;</p>
<p>It really depends on how the next election goes. Most Tory MPs support 20 weeks, most Labour and Lib Dems oppose it. If they keep splitting in the proportions they do, <a href="http://viva-freemania.blogspot.com/2008/05/20-weeks-later.html" rel="nofollow">I reckon</a> that a Tory majority of 38 would be the tipping point that puts the 20-weekers ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margin4 Error</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10793</link>
		<dc:creator>Margin4 Error</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/05/21/it-was-dorries-wot-lost-it/#comment-10793</guid>
		<description>in fairness to Ed Leigh - he's pretty up front about what he is. He's a hardline social conservative and even stood (nominally) for the Tory leadership on that basis. You can be pretty sure he holds his views completely independently and is reasonably honest about them. 

The other one? Well I drew up an interview for her this morning. she has promised to take part, I will complete my opinion of her from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in fairness to Ed Leigh - he&#8217;s pretty up front about what he is. He&#8217;s a hardline social conservative and even stood (nominally) for the Tory leadership on that basis. You can be pretty sure he holds his views completely independently and is reasonably honest about them. </p>
<p>The other one? Well I drew up an interview for her this morning. she has promised to take part, I will complete my opinion of her from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
