No, you’ll find the entrance to that at http://www.dorries.org.uk/Blog.aspx - the only place you can get to Narnia without using a wardrobe.

Thank god for that, I thought I’d entered some bizarre parallel universe for a minute.

What are you planning to debate? Stockholm syndrome?

There’s a difference between a contributer, and an employee isn’t there?

Yvonne Roberts also hosts a show on that channel. Is she an anti-Ken Holocaust denier as well?

If you want to equate Yvonne Ridley with Andrew Gilligan go right ahead.

Have we ever suggested that we’re the BBC?

No one has suggested that Gilligan is personally a Holocaust denier or that he, or Roberts, Bright, Ollie Kamm, yourself or anyone else who’s appeared/due to appear on the station, agrees with the editorial line taken by the station.

In fact, we can absolutely certain that Kamm will disagree, as he blogged the Kollerstrom not longer after UCL took the decision to cut him loose.

The question here is one of both the professional judgement of those journalists who’ve taken on contracted roles with the station and of the extent to which the station may or may not permit its presenters to follow an independent editorial line.

Both Roberts and Gilligan may well be unhappy to see the manner in which the station has chosen to put over the Kollerstrom story, but are they free to say so? And, if not, how do they view that in terms of their personal and professional integrity as journalists and their future association with the station.