Simon Hughes for Ken?


by Newswire    
April 30, 2008 at 11:08 pm

Dave Hill finds that Libdem’r Simon Hughes, “urged voters to cast their second preference for someone who had served London already”. He’s advocating Paddick as first choice of course, but does that mean Ken should be no. 2?


Print it   |   Trackback   |   Comments feed   |   to del.icio.us   |   to Facebook
Filed under: Debates , Mayor election , news

1 Comment   ||   Add your own

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.
at 10:30 am on May 1, 2008
- direct link -  
1.  comment by
     DaveHill

Three London Lib Dem party members have confided to me this morning that they will be putting Ken as their second preference.

Post a comment using the form below


 
· About the author:

· Other articles by Newswire

· This article is part of an ongoing debate on Liberal Conspiracy
Campaigns
Latest comments
» Different Duncan posted on To the sceptical and uncommitted...

» Dan posted on To the sceptical and uncommitted...

» Dan posted on What is Nadine Dorries MP's real agenda? (pt 4)

» john b posted on To the sceptical and uncommitted...

» Matthew Sinclair posted on To the sceptical and uncommitted...

» ac256 posted on To the sceptical and uncommitted...

» Tom posted on Forza, Viola

» thomas posted on Forza, Viola

» john b posted on The Fritzl case and media hypocrisy

» Steve B, UK posted on Punch, Judy and Clusterbombs

» Negating Nadine « All About Nothing posted on What is Nadine Dorries MP's real agenda? (pt 4)

» Kate Belgrave posted on Sitting on abortion in Labour

» thomas posted on Sitting on abortion in Labour

» Kate Belgrave posted on Sitting on abortion in Labour

» Kate Belgrave posted on Sitting on abortion in Labour