I would say “no”. Or at least they do not neccessarily come from the centre. If we do not believe that the Left can provide answers to the problems we face then how can we meaningfully claim to be on the left at all?

I don’t think that any manifesto has to be full of “big ideas” like the CW though. A re-statement of certain principles such as support for civil liberties, belief in public services and that not all problems can be solved by free-market/private sector solutions, and support for international law and institutions would be important. These are all things which should be pretty fundamental for the left but seem to have been forgotten by our Labour government and/or certain sections of opinion on the left.

What I would like to see is something which expresses what it means to me to be on the left in modern Britain, in a way that the Euston Manifesto for example did not.

However, the last time the left managed to get seriously radical change through was in the 1940s with the introduction of the welfare state and nationalisation of many industries. These were massive, flagship changes that affected people’s lives as well as symbolising the fact that the new Britain was going to be a better place than the pre-war Britain.

Something like the Trade Union Freedom Bill, though laudable and something I totally support, is not going to have the same effect. The left could do with rallying behind a flagship policy that will have a real transformative effect on society, and I think that policy should be the introduction of a Citizen’s Income:

http://tinyurl.com/5ma2nz

The Green Party has adopted Citizen’s Income as one of its policies, and it is for this reason alone that I have recently the Green Party. It would replace replace the current social security regime removing some of the anomolies currently in place whereby people become stuck in a welfare trap as they lose benefits when they start working. It would also pull the rug from under the feet of right wing libertarian wankers who constantly snipe at the welfare state. For decades now the left has been fighting defensively to defend the welfare state, and now is a good time to go on the attack.

It’s interesting to see the Tories pushing for greater trade union controls. This should be a real point of difference, but it seems unlikely that Labour under Brown would dare to stand up for a repeal of laws on the McDonnell lines.

The key debate is the one outlined by Sunny — does the Left believe the best solutions come from the centre? It is interesting that New Labour never really learnt anything from the New Left, which was an attempt to re-imagine progressive politics in the post-war context.

Many of the ideas coming out of London Citizens, such as the Living Wage should receive much more attention, but there’s a big difference between a collection of good ideas and a coherent manifesto.

Once we have all the good ideas and all the right people in one place, we might then stand a chance of making some progress.

Time spent trying to reform the Labour party from within is time wasted.

I think there are a few issues: principle of which is that, confronted by growing economic inequality, too many lefties instinctively veer towards greater govt intervention and power. To me that’s dangerous.

Secondly, I think you’re right in saying we need to repeal anti-union legislation, but at the same time I think they’re too cosy with the Labour party, which makes their political decisions circumspect a lot. Laurie has written here about the NUS for example.

Are there a lot of new good ideas? The London Living Wage is a few I like… what else?

Surely the problem is less a lack of political ideas on the left than a political system in which they might be better enacted?

There are a lot of good political ideas out there, and a lot of people were rather hoping that this Labour government would make them reality.

Repealing anti-trade union legislation would be one excellent example. John McDonnell couldn’t even get the Trade Union Freedom Bill read in parliament last year, though: he says the government quashed it. The Labour party does indeed believe it is in a position to sneer at the left of the party: its view must simply be that in the current electoral system, it can always rely on voters who simply can’t bring themselves to vote Tory, no matter how dreadful things get. We’re surrounded by people who are having that conversation with themselves as we speak - they don’t want to vote for Ken Livingstone, but they will vote for him to keep Boris out. People have already commented to that effect on this site, and taken those of us who think the Labour party should be punished to task.

We’ve been talking recently here about electoral reform and proportional representation models that would allow not only smaller parties in, but better representation for those parties and/or independent candidates who win some of the vote, but not enough to take constituency seats.

As I say, there are a lot of good ideas on the left, and a lot of good people working extremely hard to try and make those ideas reality - there are good campaigns, for instance, around better trade union legislation, and keeping the private sector out of public services, etc. It’s the Where Next bit that is the issue.