No swearing pls, we’re British


by Aaron Heath    
April 25, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Welcome to Casting the net, Liberal Conspiracy’s daily web review. As always, please feel free to share your own recommendations in the comments.

The Goldern Strawberry - Scandal in Helsinki? Surely not! (You’d think those Northern Europeans would be a bit less judgmental).
Shiraz Socialist - Methinks this polemic from Andrew Coates will prove quite controversial. An intricate dissection of the left and religion.
Question That - With May 1st around the corner, Ian’s running out of time and needs to make a decision: Ken or Boris?? C’mon man!
The Yorksher Gob - With a second choice vote up yer sleeve, there really isn’t any excuse for not voting for who the hell you like, however unlikely it is they’ll get the keys to City Hall.
John Harris - Are we swearing just a bit too much?
Earthpal - Those teachers are on strike. AGAIN. This mum’s just a bit pissed.
Tim Worstall - Ah, some refreshing sanity on the aviation pollution debate.

· About the author: Aaron Heath is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is a writer based in Tallinn, Estonia. He is both socially and economically liberal. His main areas of interest are foreign affairs, culture, technology, and economics. As a father of two, he also writes about parenting. Also at: tygerland.net and Rational Geekery

· Other posts by Aaron Heath

· About this article:
Print it   |   Trackback link   |   Track comments   |   send to del.icio.us   |   to Facebook
Filed under: netcast


7 Comments in response   ||   Add your own



at 1:59 pm on April 26, 2008
- direct link -  
1.  comment by
     Jennie

Are we swearing too much? Fuck, no. But seriously, the telling sign that that article has put the cart before the horse is almost at the end of it:

“to understand that vocabulary speaks volumes about prevailing social conditions, and that all our swearing says something very powerful about what a mutually contemptuous, atomised, inarticulate society we’re becoming”

Our society is fucked. A sign of that is that we’re all swearing more. And thus, if we stop swearing our society will be healed? That guy is confusing cause and effect, surely? If we heal our society, people will feel the need to swear less might have been a better conclusion.

(Oh, and thankee for the link)

at 8:21 am on April 28, 2008
- direct link -  
2.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

I was chatting to someone last night and this subject came up. I mentioned that the country is becoming overly vulgar and squalid, and that I expect a Victorianesque lurch back towards social conservatism.

I suggested that this would be most-welcome in about 16-years, around the time my little girl starts dating…

at 10:16 am on April 28, 2008
- direct link -  
3.  comment by
     Jennie

Your daughter is minus three, Aaron?

To be serious, do you not think there has BEEN a Victorianesque lurch back towards social conservatism the last ten years or so? It’s just that we’re actually seeing the stuff that the Victorians didn’t talk about - the seedy underbelly, etc. was still there in Victorian times.

at 10:39 am on April 28, 2008
- direct link -  
4.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

I know the Victorians were actually a bunch of sex pests. I was just playing.

My daughter is one in June. I’m rather hoping I can keep her under wraps for a while yet!

at 10:41 am on April 28, 2008
- direct link -  
5.  comment by
     Jennie

LMAO you’re hoping to stop her dating till she’s seventeen? What’s the weather like in cloud cuckoo land? Don’t you remember being a teenager?

at 3:32 pm on April 28, 2008
- direct link -  
6.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

#5

That’s what I’m worried about!

at 6:17 pm on April 28, 2008
- direct link -  
7.  comment by
     Jennie

Trying to stop her from dating is the worst possible way of going about assuaging your worries though, that way she will just think you don’t understand and go behind your back. [/stating the obvious]

Post a comment using the form below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

HERE AND THERE
Featured blogs

Boris - the gaffopedia


David Lammy MP -

Can we follow Obama's lead?


Lynne Featherstone MP -

What about the dads?



Recently popular
Palin, abortion and the gender agenda
(331 replies)

The 'Gordon Brown is insane' meme
(164 replies)

A-Z of right-wing online commenting
(117 replies)

Lesbian mothers and 'traditional' families
(112 replies)

We should have open primaries for elections
(108 replies)

Latest comments
» Mike Killingworth posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» Pickled Politics » Online Activism in the UK posted on The struggle within New Labour

» douglas clark posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» tim f posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» Nick posted on 2010: The Wrong Target?

» Nick posted on 2010: The Wrong Target?

» chris strange posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» Nick posted on Sir Ian Blair sacking: since when did Paul Dacre decide senior police appointments?

» douglas clark posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» Newmnia posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» thomas posted on Sir Ian Blair sacking: since when did Paul Dacre decide senior police appointments?

» sally posted on After Pinochet, Töben should be pretty safe

» sally posted on Sir Ian Blair sacking: since when did Paul Dacre decide senior police appointments?

» BenSix posted on Sir Ian Blair sacking: since when did Paul Dacre decide senior police appointments?

» Sir Ian posted on Sir Ian Blair sacking: since when did Paul Dacre decide senior police appointments?

  Last 50 // Comments feed