Konnie Huq and dodgy welfare claimants


by Chris Dillow    
January 24, 2008 at 10:45 am

Alice Miles deplores Gordon Brown’s message for Konnie Huq  on her leaving Blue Peter. Ms Miles is right, but for the wrong reasons. Mr Brown shouldn’t be thanking Konnie. He should be decrying the adverse effect she’s had upon the British economy.

The reason for this is simple. Anything that makes being out of work more pleasant encourages people to linger on benefits. And the sight of Ms Huq on daytime TV has just this effect. Why bother going out to work when you can stay home and look at her? (Of course, you could record her whilst you work - but how will you find time to watch her amid all those episodes of CSI?)

In this sense, Ms Huq’s influence upon the economy has been massively pernicious. Let’s do some sums. There are 5.2 million people of working age claiming state benefits. Let’s assume that Konnie’s appearance on Blue Peter  caused - at the margin - 5% of these to stay out of work. That’s 260,000 people. If we assume these would have earnt £15,000 a year, then the economy lost £3.9bn a year.

This means that, over the 10 years Konnie’s presented Blue Peter, we’ve lost the equivalent of a year’s spending on the defence budget. Her leaving the programme could therefore be a positive supply shock. It’ll encourage some people to find work, which in turn will raise output and reduce the inflationary pressures Mervyn King warned about last night. I suspect, however, that this effect will only partially offset  the effect Carol Vorderman’s boob job has had in curtailing labour supply. Never mind the credit crunch - that’s been the biggest economic disaster of recent years.

The point: does this seem absurd? It shouldn’t. It’s merely the logical consequence of the assumption that people on benefits could work if they want to. Perhaps it’s this premise that’s wonky.
* Cross-posted from Stumbling and Mumbling


Print it   |   Trackback   |   Comments feed   |   to del.icio.us   |   to Facebook
Filed under: Blog , Economics

12 Comments   ||   Add your own

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.
at 11:10 am on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
1.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

Konnie Huq is stunning, agreed.

BTW. could there be an argument for TV returning to 8 or 10 hrs a day? Most of its garbage, anyway. The BBC could certainly turn off its channels for most of the day, and slash the television license. Just a thought…

at 12:08 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
2.  comment by
     Cath Elliott

Sorry, I thought I was reading LC not Nuts or Loaded: Konnie Huq…phwoarrrrr, now let’s talk about Carol Vorderman’s boobs.

Give is a break Chris, this sexist shite is beneath you.

at 12:13 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
3.  comment by
     Edward

Chill out Cath, I thought it was a very funny way of headbutting a very dodgy premise (people on benefits could work if they want to).

ps Konnie Huq is pleasant to look at. Carol Vorderman scares me, i’m frightened she might sell me a dodgy loan!

at 1:08 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
4.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

Oh come on Cath. A little humour on LC wouldn’t go amiss, would it?

at 1:27 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
5.  comment by
     Cath Elliott

Bah humbug :)

at 1:30 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
6.  comment by
     Aaron Heath

Us men are primeval beasts, Cath.

It’s not our fault. Blame Darwin. ;)

at 2:44 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
7.  comment by
     Nick

“It’s not our fault. Blame Darwin. ;)”

That is the problem with the left. Always blaming someone else!

Maybe Ms Huq plays a role for sure. But perhaps we could begin by eliminating more likely causes like the lack of MONETARY incentives built into getting work. It doesn’t all have to be horrible right-wing cutting off benefits stuff. We could start by raising the no income tax allowance so that people on the minumum wage and somewhat above never have to worry about handing over the money they have earned to the government. With that extra money, broadband and BBC Iplayer could be in the reach of the previously unemployed and the “Huq factor” would also be removed.

at 7:58 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
8.  comment by
     Jennie

Is it sexist if I admit that *I* wouldn’t say no to Konnie? I draw the line at the Vord at the Board, though. After all, she only got a third in her degree… ;)

at 9:05 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
9.  comment by
     douglas clark

For folk of a certain age, me for instance, Carol Vorderman is extremely attractive. She knows useful things like what day of the week it is, or even more complicated stuff like what day of the month. And when she got over her frumpy look, whoowaar! (I hope I’ve got that right, not as young as I used to be)

Anyway I think Rupa Huq is a doll.

at 10:13 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
10.  comment by
     Kate Belgrave

Have canvassed things here at home, and it turns out neither my husband not I would say no to Konnie. Always good to find another thing in common.

Although I now suspect he had kids so he could start watching Blue Peter.

Is that bad?

at 10:19 pm on January 24, 2008
- direct link -  
11.  comment by
     Kate Belgrave

‘nor I’ I meant.

sorry

hands shaking

at 1:07 am on January 25, 2008
- direct link -  
12.  comment by
     nodn

This is the funniest post I have read on LC. Ever. And I’m female!

Post a comment using the form below


 
· About the author: Chris Dillow is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is a former City economist and now an economics writer. He is also the author of The End of Politics: New Labour and the Folly of Managerialism. Also at: Stumbling and Mumbling

· Other articles by Chris Dillow
Latest comments
» thomas posted on Why Gordon and Boris are in trouble

» Harpymarx posted on Raising our game

» thomas posted on Raising our game

» thomas posted on Raising our game

» Nick posted on 'McCain, what a jerk'

» Lee Griffin posted on Raising our game

» Mike Killingworth posted on Raising our game

» Sunny Hundal posted on Raising our game

» Jennie Rigg posted on Raising our game

» BenSix posted on Gender, Ethics, Science.

» Laurie Penny posted on Raising our game

» Lee Griffin posted on Raising our game

» donpaskini posted on Raising our game

» Lee Griffin posted on Gender, Ethics, Science.

» Lee Griffin posted on Raising our game